martedì 10 giugno 2014

CONDIVIDETE E RISPONDETE!!!!! (da Stop Vivisection)


CONDIVIDETE E DIFFONDETE AL MASSIMO QUESTA OPPORTUNITA' DI DIRE NO AL SEGRETO DELLE PROCEDURE, NO ALLA VIVISEZIONE! 
>> Qui trovate le domande del governo inglese: http://www.homeofficesurveys.homeoffice.gov.uk/s/111295XIPYF
>> e qui trovate la "guida alla consultazione" con le risposte che ci suggerisce di dare l'associazione ANIMAL AID: http://www.animalaid.org.uk/images/pdf/S24consultationquickguide.pdf
Come vedrete, alle domande 4 - 5 - 8 - 10 - 14 - 17 non occorre rispondere.

Alle domande 1 - 20 la risposta è: NO

Alle domande 2 - 3 - 6 - 7 - 9 la risposta è: NOT AT ALL

Alle domande 11 - 12 - 13 la risposta è: VERY MUCH SO

Alla domanda 15 la risposta è: "The purpose of ASPA is to protect animals used in research, yet the Impact Assessment - IA makes no mention of how each Policy Option would affect them - Policy option 3 would result in various benefits for animals (pleae see: http://www.animalaid.org.uk/images/pdf/AAresponseS24consultation.pdf)".

Alla domanda 16 la risposta è: "THE IMPACT ASSESSMENT (IA) IS FOUNDED ON A FAULTY ASSUMPTION ABOUT THE UTILITY OF ANIMAL RESEARCH (please see: http://www.animalaid.org.uk/images/pdf/AAresponseS24consultation.pdf)".

Alla domanda 18 la risposta è: "An example of this would be selling commercial secrets relating to pharmaceuticals. Disclosure of information obtained through undercover investigations would definitely not constitute malicious disclosure, whether this related to malpractice or procedures conducted in an authorised manner"

Alla domanda 21 la risposta è: "To achieve genuine transparency, a simple online facility should be created to make Project Licence Apllications available before they are granted. This would not amount to the Home Office ceding control of the harm-benefit assessment, but would bring the licensing of animal experiments in line with other regulatory activities conducted by public bodies, such as the administration of planning applications. This approach would allow for valuable input from outside experts, such as suggestions on non-animal alternatives".

Naturalmente ciascuno è libero di personalizzare le proprie risposte come crede. Quella di Animal Aid va infatti considerata solo un'utilissima guida alla consultazione.
Qui le risposte complete di Animal Aid: http://www.animalaid.org.uk/images/pdf/AAresponseS24consultation.pdf